Prolog Technology for Default Reasoning: Proof Theory and Compilation Techniques

نویسندگان

  • Torsten Schaub
  • Stefan Brüning
چکیده

The aim of this work is to show how Prolog technology can he used for efficient implementation of query answering in default logics. The idea is to translate a default theory along with a query into a Prolog program and a Prolog query such that the original query is derivable from the default theory iff the Prolog query is derivable from the Prolog program. In order to comply with the goal-oriented proof search of this approach, we focus on default theories supporting local proof procedures, as exemplified by so-called semi-monotonic default theories. Although this does not capture general default theories under Reiter’s interpretation, it does so under alternative ones’. For providing theoretical underpinnings, we found the resulting compilation techniques upon a top-down proof procedure based on model elimination. We show how the notion of a model elimination proof can be refined to capture default proofs and how standard techniques for implementing and improving model elimination theorem provers (regularity, lemmas) can be adapted and extended to default reasoning. This integrated approach allows us to push the concepts needed for handling defaults from the underlying calculus onto the resulting compilation techniques. This meth’od for default theorem proving is complemented by a model-based approach to incremental consistency checking. We show that the crucial task of consistency checking can benefit from keeping models in order to restrict the attention to ultimately necessary consistency checks. This is supported by the concept of default lemmas that allow for an additional avoidance of redundancy.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Compiling Prioritized Default Rules into Ordinary Logic Programs Limited Distribution Notice

Prioritized default rules o er a conveniently higher level of speci cation that facilitates revision and modularity. They handle con icts, including arising during updating of rule sets, using partially-ordered prioritization information that is naturally available based on relative speci city, recency, and authority. Despite having received much study, however, they have had as yet little impa...

متن کامل

Query - answering in Reiter ’ s Default Logic ( Extended Abstract )

We introduce new concepts for default reasoning in the context of query-answering in regular default logic. For this purpose, we develop a proof-oriented approach for deciding whether a default theory has an extension containing a given query. The inherent problem in Reiter’s default logic is that it necessitates the inspection of all default rules for answering no matter what query. Also, defa...

متن کامل

Modeling Simultaneous Events with Default Reasoning and Tight Derivations

D This report describes how an arbitrator for the game of Diplomacy was implemented in PROLOG, and discusses the advantages of logic programming for this type of problem. The design of the program is greatly simplified by using a default reasoning style to express many of the game rules. The technique of default reasoning is to specify a predicate (or property or situation) by stating sufficien...

متن کامل

A Modal Computational Framework for Default Reasoning

Usually a default rule A : B/C is intended to mean that if A holds in a state of affairs a B is consistent, then C follows by default. However, C is not a necessary conclusion: different states of affairs are possible (conceivable). According to this view, Meyer and van der Hoek [MvH92] developed a multimodal logic, called S5P(n), for treating non-monotonic reasoning in a monotonic setting. In ...

متن کامل

Natural Language Understanding Using Temporal Action Logic

We consider a logicist approach to natural language understanding based on the translation of a quasi-logical form into a temporal logic, explicitly constructed for the representation of action and change, and the subsequent reasoning about this semantic structure in the context of a background knowledge theory using automated theorem proving techniques. The approach is substantiated through a ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Artif. Intell.

دوره 106  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 1998